STATELESS
PLANTATION TAMILS
India should join hands with Norway and
participate in peace talks. It is no good to refrain from participation.
Between 1871-1881 when coffee, tea plantations came up in large numbers in
Ceylon, lots of Tamils from India went there seeking work. They constituted
nearly 10 % of the then population of Ceylon. Donoughmore Commission
constituted before independence said out of these roughly 50 percent labour
were permanently residing in Ceylon. Jackson Report of 1928 said they were
around 60 percent. The Soulbury Commission of 1946 stated 80 percent of these
labour were permanent residents of Ceylon.
Donoughmore
Commission had recommended that for all those who had lived for 5 years and
above citizenship rights must be conferred. Ceylonese Government did not accept
that recommendation, thus the crisis started. In 1940 both India and Ceylon
discussed this issue. Again in 1941 September there was a bi party conference
between India and Ceylon. The agreed joint declaration which emanated in this
meeting was not implemented.
The irony is in 1942 Ceylonese Government itself
wrote to Indian Government requesting India to permit labour to come and work
in its rubber plantations. In the first General Elections of 1947 plantation
labour had voting rights. They backed the Ceylon Indian Congress and elected 7
members to Parliament. They were the deciding factor in another 20
parliamentary constituencies. D.S.Senanayaka, first Prime Minister of Ceylon
amended the 8 th article of the Citizenship Act and disenfranchised plantation
Tamils called as Malayaga Tamils. He passed in Parliament the amendment by 1949
and removed people of Indian origin from the voters list. That is how the
voting rights of plantation Tamils who chose 7 Members to Parliament was
deprived from them.
Then Indian origin people were asked to apply for
citizenship. 8,25,000 people applied for citizenship. Only to 1,00,000 people
Ceylonese citizenship was granted.
To resolve this deadlock at London both
Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Ceylon Prime Minister Dudley
Senanaiyaka talked but could not resolve. In 1954 a pact was signed between
Jawaharlal Nehru and Sir John Kotewala, Ceylon Premier. It was never
implemented.
By 1964, Srilankan Prime Minster Srimavo Bandaranaike and Indian
Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri signed a pact, wherein Srilanka agreed to
give citizenship to 3,00,000 persons. India admitted to take back 5,25,000
persons.
"All
American people were once migrants from Europe. Yet no European country
foolishly signed a pact with America to take back its citizens. Even after
signing such a pact India had left more than 2,00.000 people of Indian origin
in Srilanka. India considers the whole Srilankan problem as one between its
original inhabitant Tamils of Ealam and Sinhalese. Dravidian parties have
totally forgotten about our people i.e stateless Tamils of Indian origin. To
resolve the hardships caused to these stateless Tamils it is imperative India
too to participate in the peace talks. India cannot keep away from any issue of
South East Asia. India has left 2,00,000 of its citizens in Srilanka, when such
being the case how can it keep away ? Is it not the duty of India to take
responsibility for every Indian citizen on alien soil ?" asked
N.Nandhivarman General Secretary Dravida Peravai in a press meet on the eve of his departure to
Vijayawada to attend the National executive of Samata Party as a Special
invitee. Dravida Peravai had been the associate party of samata party headed by
George Fernandes.
[Samata
National Executive at Vijayawada: Union Ministers George Fernandes, Nitish
Kumar, Digvijay Singh, and Nandhivarman
,others ]
Courtesy:
Daily Thanthi15.06.2002 & New Times Observer 10.06.2002
Columnist
Rajiv Dhavan wrote an article in The Hindu titled
INDIA's
REFUGEE LAW AND POLICY [Extracts]
With
its open borders South Asia like Africa is a refugee prone region. India
discovered this when absorbing the Tibetan refugees in 1959, the Bangla desh
refugees in 1971, the Chakma influx in 1963, the Tamil influx from Srilanka in
1983, 1989 and again in 1995, the Afghan refugees from 1980s, the Myanmarese
refugees for a similar period and migration and refugee movements from
Bangladesh over the years........ In 1995 India following the Pakistan's
example joined the Executive of the UNHCR. Though welcome, this half way house
seems odd since India refuses to sign 1951 convention. Meanwhile a series of
judgments by The Supreme Court and the Gujarat, Punjab, Gauhati and Tamil Nadu
High Courts has reinforced the need for humane due process for the Chakmas,
Srilankan and other refugees. Some of
the judgments expressly recognize the value and worth of UNHCR and invite it to
involve more in the refugee questions in India..
This
thought provoking article prompted Dravida Peravai to come out with its views.
DRAVIDA
PERAVAI QUESTIONED THE WISDOM OF INDIA NOT SIGNING THE 1951 CONVENTION. DRAVIDA
PERAVAI URGED THE 40 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FROM TAMIL NADU & PONDICHERRY TO
COMPARE HOW TIBETAN REFUGEES AND SRILANKA TAMILS ARE TREATED?
"While
Tibetan refugees live peacefully with properties and are moving freely in Coorg
areas of Karnataka, why Tamil refugees alone are handled like cattle confined
to camps? Let our M.P's ponder".
[Amnesty
International representative speaks , Peoples Watch Henry Tipagne ,DP Gen.Sec
Nandhivarman, Professor Lenin Thangappa, Trade Union leader S.Muthu and NCP
leader Dheenadayalan are in the Human Rights symposium]
"There
are 4 lakh of stateless Tamils in Myanmar, The Malayaga Tamils are still
stateless. Those who came from Burma left their savings in the banks there, for
the recovery of such property why no parliamentarian speaks ?"the
statement published in many dailies raised certain questions.[27.09.2004]
No comments:
Post a Comment