Wednesday, October 31, 2018

DRAVIDA PERAVAI VIEW ON BURMA's STRUGGLE FOR DEMOCRACY IN 2010



DEMOCRACIES FAIL TO RESCUE DEMOCRACY IN MYNMAR

Nobel Peace Laureate cannot thrive on laurels alone. Nobel Prize is just a veil to hide the failure of world’s democracies to come to the rescue of democracy in Myanmar. Aung san Suu kyi and 1400 men who stood by democracy are under detention in Myanmar for 5307 days as on 8 th May of 2010. Aung San Suu Kyi is serving her third term in house arrest, and let us not forget that she is the democratically elected people’s leader of Myanmar. The cunning ways conceived by military rulers had brought the political party headed by her, National League for Democracy to close down. It is saddest day for democracy. It is a international shame, the cross of which had to be borne by all leading democracies including our India. Indians remain helpless spectators while 50,000 Tamils are killed in a state sponsored genocide in neighbouring Sriklanka. We say the Tamils stood for terrorism. But in Myanmar, the NLD stood by democracy and we don’t even raise our voice against suppression of democracy. The so called war against terrorism will also expose that world nation’s failed to nurture democracy to end dictatorships. Let me quote the criticism of the Burma’s Government in Exile .

Dr Tint Swe, a member of the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma -- formed by elected representatives from Burma after the elections of 1990 -- describes the situation of his country on the eve of the verdict in the trial against Aung San Suu Kyi, with an eye on the elections in 2010.

The military is prepared for the next phases, which is to legalize their grip on power by holding a new election in 2010. Ethnic groups are subjected to tremendous pressure to be transformed into border guards. This process is being done by hook or by crook.We then need to add a few more important facts about my country. Burma has become a nuclear power while the population's living conditions are extremely poor. The country is selling natural gas to Thailand and China while people have to cut wood from trees to cook. According to 2005 UNDP survey one third of the population live below the poverty line. Inflation is adding to the economic burden, with the price of rice, for example, up by 30 percent over the past year alone. But the regime is rich enough to construct a series of secret underground tunnels reportedly built with North Korean help.

There are clear differences between the positions of the Indian government and the movement for democracy in Burma. One of them is the controversial roadmap of the regime. The roadmap was unilaterally withdrawn and abandoned by the military in 2003 just after Suu Kyi was ambushed and put under house arrest for the third time. The National Assembly was reduced to a façade. The constitution was entirely flawed. Neither a civilian nor a woman can become the president. The referendum was a huge scam and as will be the elections of 2010.

I want all countries to stop selling arms to Burmese regime because arms are meant for killing pro-democracy activists and ethnic peoples. I want India to refrain from defending the regime at the international forums; at the United Nations, at the International Labor Organization, and at the UN Commission on Human Rights.

In 2007 while thousands of monks were protesting, India was only country which sent a cabinet minister to sign a memorandum with the regime. And earlier, India fully supported that roadmap as expressed by Indian President Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam on March 9, 2006 during his visit to Burma. Moreover, India sent a cabinet minister to the funeral of Burmese Prime Minister who was known for his bloody hand in crackdowns on pro-democracy activists

The constructive engagement approach championed by the Southeast Asian bloc (ASEAN) proved ineffective. At the same time western sanctions were eased for humanitarian reason. But those same people did not criticize the military regime which deliberately blocked international aid during devastating cyclone Nargis when 140,000 died. The blame game does not help poor people of Burma. Now the new American administration is reviewing its Burma policy. My question why not India!

Dravida Peravai condemns the attitude of USA and Western nations that support kingdoms and dictatorships in Middle East just to get oil. All principles are sent to catacombs, while commercial and vested interests, prevail. India totally forgets it has a neighbour called Myanmar, and where its geopolitical interests are on every day basis butchered to help China gain access to Indian Ocean and Bay of Bengal.

Dravida Peravai warns the world against the conscience of nations kept under pause while military rule eliminates last traces of democracy in their soil. If world really wants terrorists to undergo heart change, then world’s agenda should be to democratize the world, removing military dictatorships to the archives of the past.

Dravida Peravai salutes Ms.AUNG SAN SUU KYI and stands by NationaL League for Democracy. Dravida Peravai expresses solidarity with the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma. We urge India which had shown the door to a National Security Adviser who had neither the mental equilibrium nor the moral foundations to understand the plight of Eelam Tamils, to come forward to evolve policies for Saving Democracy in Myanmar and support the peaceful struggle for democracy led by Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi.

N.Nandhivarman
General Secretary Dravida Peravai
8.5.2010


Sunday, October 28, 2018

INDIAN JOURNALS INVESTIGATED RAJIV GANDHI MURDER MYSTERY ........ TRUTH MUST BE ESTABLISHED : 2009




HIDDEN MASTERMINDS WITHIN CONGRESS:

RAJIV GANDHI MURDER MYSTERY

The spokesperson of the Congress party in charge of Tamilnadu affairs had sought Srilanka to hand over LTTE supremo Mr.Velupillai Prabakaran which is the top story in Deccan Chronicle on 4th January 2009.So the cat is out of the bag. All these days the United Progressive Alliance government headed by Mr.Manmohan Singh had been pretending to be heeding to the unanimous resolution passed by the Tamilnadu assembly to stop the genocidal war and also making false promises to depute the Minister of External Affairs Mr.Pranab Mukherjee to advice Srilankan government to halt the war. Its real motive is revenge, and nothing else. It wants millions of Tamils to be annihilated to avenge the death of a Former Indian Prime Minister. It has neither humanitarian concern to intervene to stop the genocide nor it has geo-political interests to uphold Indian interests in the region. China which has no access to Indian Ocean, has got that access with the help of Srilanka by firmly entrenching its foot in Hampanthotta harbor it builds in Southern tip of Srilanka to watch the sea routes of the Indian Ocean. Actually by building harbors for Mynmar, Bangladesh, Maldives and Pakistan, China had encircled India. China has foothold in Bay of Bengal, thanks to the red carpet welcome of Bangladesh and Myanmar. Srilanka had tied its fate to Chinese designs by offering on platter Hampanthotta to have total control of the sea lanes of the Indian Ocean. Maldives and Pakistan had provided a foothold for China in Arabian Sea. China arms the Srilankan government in its genocidal war. India too strangely is an accomplice of China and Pakistan in the war theatre of the killing fields of Tamil Eelam. The hatred towards LTTE had even blinded India about the harm it inflicts on its own geo-political interests.

 The Rajiv Gandhi murder mystery needs to be solved, if at all for present government or any future government in India to come out of a phobia and to arrive at a balanced mind. It is high time to recall that in the aftermath of Mrs.Indira Gandhi’s murder by misguided Sikhs, Congress leaders and cadres went on for teaching Sikhs a lesson, and that ended the lives of few thousand Sikhs. The needle of suspicion pointed out leading Congress leaders as responsible for those killings. Sikhs did not demand that Congress party as an organization is guilty of those revenge killings. Neither the Congress condemned Sikhs as criminal race as it treats Tamils in Eelam. Congress in fact has its government headed by a Sikh. The reasonable logic that is applied with regard to Sikhs goes on missing eaten by some sudden invasion of hate virus in the minds of the Congressmen that looses its mental equilibrium on handling Tamil affairs. Hence a national debate on Mr.Rajiv Gandhi’s murder becomes necessary. It is not a new wine but in fact an old wine served in new bottle. Yes, the national debate of past is brought out again.

OUTLOOK, India’s News magazine in its 24th November 1997 issue has the wrapper story titled : THE MISSING FILES, on crucial files concerning the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case have either been lost or suppressed. Outlook investigated that mystery. In the lengthy story within the magazine the title is :THE DEADLY DUO.

It would be historically important to tell who the Deadly Duo are ? They are not in LTTE, the banned organization but they belong to the Congress, which had not been banned nor initiated action even posthumously on the key beneficiary of the Rajiv Gandhi assassination. We reproduce the Outlook story here, as it appeared. We urge the world community to carefully read in between the lines the role of the real murderers of Rajiv Gandhi. We urge for the awakening of the conscience among the Congressmen, and if that hate virus infected Congress brains have to be formatted before installing the Anti-Tamil virus programme, let it be done. The curse India casts on all Tamils as criminal race and need to be done to death by genocidal Sinhalese army, is a historical blunder. The Nazi Hitler was taught a befitting lesson by USA,USSR,GB and other democratic forces of the world, but the Neo-Nazi Hitler Rajapakhshe thrives on the support of extreme opposite poles in geo-politics, namely India and Pakistan, India and China. Also the man who invaded Iraq in search of Chemical weapons, which were not found till date, but only shoes are found at the fag end of his time, Mr.George Bush is forcing India to repeat his Iraqi mistake in Srilanka, at least in the limited context of blaming LTTE and TAMILS for Rajiv Gandhi murder, to use it as reason to turn blind eye to genocide.
N.Nandhivarman, General Secretary, Dravida Peravai.

OUT LOOK STORY :

THE DEADLY DUO
Crucial evidence linking Chandraswami to the Rajiv case went missing from Rao’s PMO, OUTLOOK investigates.

·        File No:8-1-WR/JSS/90/Vol III – containing notings of bureaucrats regarding security arrangements for Rajiv Gandhi from November 1989 was lost from the Prime Ministers Office in 1991. Later, it was doctored and re-constructed by the Narasimha Rao Government before it was submitted to Jain Commission.

·        File No: 1/12014/5/91-IAS/DIII reported missing since 1995.It pertained to the terms of reference of the Verma and Jain Commissions of Inquiry.

·        File containing intercepted messages from foreign intelligence agencies, said to be addressed to Chandraswami and Janata Party President Subramanian Swamy, destroyed by senior officials in the PMO.

·        File on IB’s assessment of the role played by Zail Singh and Chandraswami in 1987 to topple Rajiv Gandhi missing.

·        File with records of official briefings by intelligence agencies on the assassination to Rao’s Home Minister S.B.Chavan missing. The former Minister confirms he was briefed orally.

·        The April 20, 1991 wireless intercept with the leading question, should Rajiv be killed in Delhi or Madras missing

·        File relating to the Rao governments attempt to wind up the Jain commission is still withheld from the panel.

Do these files/messages and other sensitive information-categorised as untraceable , missing, destroyed or cannot be revealed due to security reasons- hold the key to the mystery that shrouds Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination ? The Jain Commission thinks so. The AICC[ All India Congress Committee] has been pressing for these files and documents. And intelligence officials admit in private that vital evidence seems to have been suppressed to ensure that the largest conspiracy behind the May 21, 1991 assassination does not come to light .

It is these missing files, documents and intercepts that have kept alive the basic question – Who killed Rajiv Gandhi ? Who participated, plotted or silently abetted in the act? Right through his 5 year term, Narasimha Rao fuelled the intrigue by losing, misplacing, reconstructing, denying the existence and even allegedly destroying key files. His government did everything it could do to place stumbling blocks and even allegedly tried to wind up the Jain Commission inquiring into the conspiracy.

After interviewing serving and retired IB ,RAW, CBI and Home Ministry officials Outlook has learned that the Rao’s government’s extreme reluctance to part with crucial files and wireless intercepts seems to have been aimed at protecting god-man Chandraswami, whose links with international arms traders is an open secret. Whenever the trial led to him, every effort was made by the government not to cooperate with the Jain Commission. Accordingly, the file on Chandraswami’s links with the LTTE prior to the assassination was never made available to the commission. Says AICC appointed lawyer R.N.Mittal, closely associated with the Jain Commission’s proceedings “ At every stage, we have been denied documents. Our investigations have been like a personal effort against all odds.”

Political circles are well aware of the reason why Chandraswami was being protected. The god-man has close links with Rao-the two have been friends for 25 years. It’s common knowledge that the tantrik was treated as a VIP when Rao was Prime Minister and had special access to Rao’s official residence, 7, Race Course Road.

Reliable sources say, when the Commission, in face of resistance from the Government, insisted that it be provided with certain documents, Rao ordered a sorting operation. A top Cabinet Secretariat official was asked to divide the documents into three categories :innocuous ones which could be passed on to the commission ,documents on which privilege could be claimed before handing them over, and highly sensitive intelligence reports, wireless intercepts and other documents which could not be given to the commission at any cost.

The crucial third category, says sources, contained wireless intercepts of messages between foreign intelligence agencies to Chandraswami and Subramaniam Swamy. They were passed on by the RAW to the Cabinet Secretariat. A RAW official confirmed to the Jain Commission that the transcripts had indeed been passed on by the intelligence agency.

What did some of these missing files have ? Intelligence sources say one file contained intercepted messages as well as details of the movements of Subramaniam swamy and Chandra swami on assassination day. It also contains a crucial intercept from Jaffna to LTTE operatives saying that funds have been provided for carrying out the assassination. It refers to god-man having made the payment.

Interestingly the fact that the Rao government had actually doctored a file came to light when Vinod Pande , who was the Cabinet Secretary in V.P.Singh’s government, deposed before the Jain Commission that file No.8-1-WR/JSS/90/Vol III in which he had made notings on Rajiv Gandhi’s security – had been tampered with. “ The file which has been placed in my hands does not contain an official copy of my note dated January 30,1990.The first few paras of the draft are not mine.” Pande told the commission.

Hard pressed, the Rao government had to give an explanation. It told the commission that the file had been missing since 1991.It had been sent to the PMO on July 27, 1991 and had since disappeared. P.Chidambaram, the Minister in charge of the assassination investigation and the probes, told the commission that despite “ going over a toothcomb” in the PMO, Home Ministry as well as Prime Minister’s residence, the file had not been located and therefore had to be reconstructed. Strangely, it took the government 4 years time to own it up that it had submitted a file which was not the original.

Clearly, had the Jain Commission not demanded these files and documents,  it would have been given a free run by Rao to continue with its slow, meandering enquiry. Indeed , with the Special Investigation Team of the CBI restricted to inquiring into the actual killing and the larger conspiracy left to the Jain Commission, nothing much was expected to emerge. But it was Jain’s insistence that the commission be given access to the suppressed files that made Rao panic and provoked the subsequent cover-up operation.

Details available with Outlook suggest there were enough intercepts with Indian intelligence agencies that a hit on Rajiv was imminent. On April 20,1991 RAW intercepted a message from Jaffna with the leading question, should Rajiv be killed in Delhi or Madras ? Four days before Rajiv was killed, the same intelligence agency intercepted what is regarded as the LTTE’s final okay to its team led by Sivarasan or the one-eyed Jack. The message came in an eight line Tamil doggerel identifying the place and timing of the assault. The message was conveyed to the IB head quarters in Delhi, but unfortunately for Rajiv, it was a week end and the doggerel was decoded much after the damage was done.

But there had been enough warnings that there was a larger plot to kill Rajiv. Yasser Arafat , chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization had warned Rajiv of an international plot to assassinate him. He had conveyed this information to then Prime Minister Chandrasekar. But no follow up investigation was ever carried out.

According to PLO spokesperson contacted by Outlook, Arafat had concrete information about the plot. His source “people in Lebanon and Europe “ Arafat, through his Ambassador in Delhi, Khalid El Sheikh told me that LTTE and Sikh organizations are planning to kill Rajiv Gandhi during his election campaign on May. Sheikh had met Rajiv on March 13, 1991. A week later he called on the Congress President with a letter from Arafat. And a fortnight before the assassination, he called on Rajiv yet again.

Arafat provided details of the conspiracy to Chandrasekar when he attended Rajiv’s funeral. The Indian Ambassador to one of the North African countries was asked to contact Arafat. Then Foreign Secretary Muchkund Dubey, was also sent to see Arafat separately. In this June 1991 meeting Arafat confirmed the international conspiracy. Dubey and the Ambassador then filed a report on their meetings with the PLO Chairman. But again, no action was taken on this lead. When asked about the files by Justice Jain, Rao feigned ignorance. “I don’t remember about it. The matter was not brought to my notice.”

Meanwhile the Report of William Carry, who headed a US Senate Sub-Committee to probe into the BCCI bank scam, confirms that the bank had accounts of arms dealers Adnan Khashoggi and Ernie Miller. Both are known disciples of Chandraswam. Crucially, the Carry report also notes that $ 84 million was transferred to the LTTE from their accounts. Carry says the money was used for the Rajiv Gandhi assassination. Senate investigations also revealed that Mossad, CIA and LTTE had accounts in the BCCI.

Interestingly in a statement before the Commission R.Velusamy, then President of Tamilnadu Janata Party contended that Subramanian swamy had checked into Trident Hotel in Madras while Chandrswami was lodged at Sindoor Hotels owned by Apollo Hospitals on May 21, the day Rajiv was assassinated. Both left for Bangalore by car through Sriperumbudur before reaching Delhi on a special flight.

He told Outlook: “ May I also state that Dr.Swamy went via Sriperumbudur and stopped at the venue of the meeting, ostensibly to look at the role of Maragatham Chandrasekar, Congress candidate in the Parliamentary polls, for whom Rajiv went to campaign in Sriperumbudur- in selecting the site. I declare that Swamy told me about the role played by one JP Builders in persuading Maragatham Chandrasekar in selecting the site for Rajiv’s meeting.”

Veluswamy claims he called Swamy’s residence in Delhi at 10.45 AM on May 21 and Swamy’s wife told him that he was indeed in Madras. Recalls Veluswamy, “ My efforts to reach him proved futile. According to senior party colleagues , Dr.Swamy had an hour long meeting with S.C.Chandrahasan, a Srilankan Tamil ideologue , at Hotel Trident before he vacated the room and proceeded to meet Chandraswamy at Hotel Sindoori owned by Chandraswami’s disciple Dr.Pratap Reddy. While I could confirm that a room was booked for Dr.Swamy on May 21st at Trident, I could not get any details about Chandraswami’s stay. Sindoori never maintains any documents to show Chandraswami’s visits and he stays there as a personal guest of Pratap Reddy.”

Swamy has been denying that he was in Madras on May 21. But his Tamilnadu unit Chief has given details of his itinerary. Stated Veluswamy before the Jain Commission. “ Dr.Swamy admits arriving at Madras on 19.5.1991.He admits travelling with me by my car and he admits that we had a halt at Kanchipuram and that I was his translator. He admits that I was with him at Salem at 8.30 PM in the evening on 20.5.1991 and I am his translator in the Salem Town meeting. He admits that he was to return to Madras on May 22 and then fly to Madurai via Trichy and that I was to join him at Trichy. He is however silent on where he stayed in Madras on the morning of May 21 and how long he stayed there. But in the next paragraph of the affidavit , Swamy does a volte face.”On 21.5.1991, I was not in Madras at all or in Bangalore or indeed in South India but I was in Delhi”

He continues “ The issue is, while Swamy contends he gave a statement to the Delhi PTI on May 21, he is very vague about his time of arrival at Delhi. The facts are very clear from even available documents. He was with me well past midnight on the 20th, which is actually the wee hours of the 21st. It takes 6 hours to reach Madras by road. If he had reached Delhi by any morning flight, there would be any number of records to show the flight and its time of departure. I have already given proof that a room was booked in Dr.Swamy’s name in Trident.”

It’s is significant that there were several attempts to keep the conspiracy angle out of the ambit of a probe into the assassination. When the Chandra sekar regime, in which Swamy was Law Minister, appointed the Verma Commission of inquiry, its scope was limited to investigating security lapses.

The more closely one examines the Rajiv assassination case, the curiouser it becomes. For instance the most significant evidence with the SIT linking the LTTE to the assassination are photographs clicked by Haribabu, the photographer who also died in the blast. The first pictures released by the SIT to the media showed three women-Kokila, a 15year old who went to recite a Hindi poem to Rajiv, her mother and Dhanu, later identified as human bomb. It was only after the DMK organ Murasoli reproduced with a caption “ where is the missing man ?’’ – that the SIT reproduced the full frame. The missing man turned out to be Sivarasan. No explanations were offered as to why the SIT masked part of the frame.

Even more intriguing is the role played by SIT, DIG Srikumar, who had gone to London to collect additional information on the witnesses as well as the background of some of the accussed. He not only failed to make any progress, but also had his briefcase snatched. The case contained vital information about LTTE’s arms procurement and delivery routes, their points-men in Europe and their nexus with global arms dealers.

When the SIT arrested key witness Mirasdar Shanmugam on July 17- 1991, it chanced upon messages and transcripts of some coded messages. Shanmugam, according to the charge-sheet received Sivarasan and his killer squad on the TN coast on May 1-1991.The coded messages not only spoke about the assassination, but also about the high level people connected with the plot. Shanmugam escaped from SIT custody and hung himself from a tree under mysterious circumstances. K.Mohandass, a former DGP of Tamilnadu, says Shanmugam’s case was clear murder and the CBI had done a clumsy cover up job. “ Shanmugam was wearing a white dhothi when he was taken for interrogation. How come when his body was found, he was wearing a lungi ?” he asks.

The circumstances leading to the suicide of the main accused Sivarasan or one-eyed Jack-for whom a high pitched manhunt had been launched across Tamilnadu and Karnataka on the outskirts of Bangalore are equally mysterious. While the other accused Shobha, and Sivarasan both reportedly consumed cyanide ,in classic LTTE manner, Sivarasan also seemed to have shot himself. But according to state intelligence sources, Sivarasan knew too much and there is a possibility that the bullet wounds were not self inflicted. The case gets curiouser –Sivarasan’s body was immediately cremated, while Shobha’s was preserved as an exhibit.

It becomes clear from this sequence of events that most of the key players in actual plotting and execution of the killing have died under mysterious circumstances. And with the main accused LTTE chief Prabakaran still ensconced in LTTE strongholds in northern Lanka, the SIT has none of the crucial players in the case in custody.

Adding to this mess is the cover up orchestrated  by Rao’s regime. Rao’s persistent amnesia before the Jain Commission on the question of taking action on the Verma panel’s observation on official lapses makes interesting reading. “I would not be able to say off hand what all happened in connection with the steps taken for the implementation of the action taken report. The job was entrusted to a group of Ministers, I expected them to do the needful. I do not remember whether there was any timeframe for the group of ministers. As per reports, there was a stalemate. So the matter came up before the cabinet. What decision the cabinet took, it is a matter of record. I do not remember .”

Interestingly, a PIL was filed in the Delhi High Court by a little known lawyer, Mustaq Ahamed, demanding the scrapping of the Jain Commission. After this was turned down, the central government approached the Supreme Court  with a Special Leave Petition. When questioned about this by the commission, Rao said “ The PIL initiated in the Delhi High Court did not come to my knowledge. The question must have been looked into by P.Chidambaram and therefore SLP’s were filed. If Chidambaram wanted to consult me, he could have, but Chidambaram did not consult me. “ However it is well known that P.Chidambaram who was made Minister in charge of the Rajiv Gandhi assassination probe, was acting on Rao’s instructions. Ahmed’s PIL, according to political circles, also had the blessings of the then Prime Minister.

An important missing link is the file containing records of the official briefings to the then Home Minister S.B.Chavan, when he talked about the involvement of CIA in the assassination. Not surprisingly Chavan’s stand on the subject was in complete variance with what Rao had to say. Said Chavan in his affidavit before the Jain Commission :The LTTE was just an instrument in the hands of some foreign powers.” Then reacting to the charge made by former Congress Minister K.K.Tiwari, who has been meticulously following the Jain Commission’s proceedings, Chavan said “ The general impression which K.K.Tiwari gave is not altogether wrong because there are forces who are trying to create destabilizing conditions.”

In the ongoing snafu, the Ministry of External Affairs chose to deny the Home Minister’s statement that the Americans were involved in the killing. Chavan told the commission : “ It is correct that the very day the American Ambassador in India met the Indian Prime Minister, the foreign minister, foreign secretary and the spokesperson of MEA held a press conference and contradicted the statement regarding the involvement of a super power. It is abnormal that a spokesperson of the MEA held the press conference contradicting my statement.” Then again “ I am still of the view that some foreign power is involved. It is not the job of LTTE. The general impression is that some other powers may be involved.”

Whether the LTTE acted on its own or whether there was an international conspiracy is still a grey area- Justice Jain had not been able to make any definite conclusions about this aspect. But the manner in which Rao sought to hold back information from the Jain Commission, coupled with the shoddy investigation indicates there was a concerted attempt to protect key players. Evidence is absent, but join up the blank spaces and a pattern emerges.
Courtesy :
OUTLOOK magazine dated 24th November 1997.




CONCLUDING THE STORY : BUT LET YOUR CONSCIENCE AWAKEN

Those who read the OUTLOOK’s investigative story published a decade ago must be baffled at the outburst of the spokesperson of Congress party Mr.Veerappa Moily asking Srilanka to hand over LTTE leader Prabakaran, if caught.

Why is it Congress wants Prabakaran ? Is it to unearth the mystery behind Rajiv’s murder ? The role of Chandraswami and Narasimha Rao dubbed as deadly duo by OUTLOOK has not come to the minds of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Chairperson of the United Progressive Alliance Madam Sonia Gandhi. The then Indian Home Minister S.B.Chavan’s statement before Jain Commission pointing accusing fingers at foreign powers did not awaken Madam Sonia Gandhi’s conscience. Mrs.Priyanka Gandhi visited Vellore prison to know the truth. Recent report in Junior Vikatan states that Bengaluru Ranganath asserts that the killing squad was blessed in a pooja by Chandraswami. Yet none from Congress party wants to unearth the truth, to find out if any black sheep existed in its ranks. It is understandable that the black sheep of those days want to bury truth. The fate of mysterious dead caught for the crime is to bury evidences. Now the demand to fix Prabakaran is also to put the blame on his shoulders and crucify him. There is no real attempt to find truth even under the Government remote controlled by Rajiv’s widow. It would be left to western authors to investigate and write books on the Rajiv Gandhi murder mystery .

Even if some LTTE cadres are involved, in what way it is morally correct to blame one organization of a crime. 

The same OUTLOOK before one general election brought out a list of 72 Parliament Members involved in crimes, cutting across party divide.

Is it justifiable to ban those political parties that had nourished criminals. Organizations banned for the murder of the Father of the Nation, are freed from bondage, and such bans are only for limited periods. Lifelong Tamils have to be enslaved, no organization should exist to give protection to Tamils, and this sadistic resolve of the Government headed by Manmohan Singh and the political party that props him, is a curse for a noble land like India. In every metropolis, be it Mumbai or Chennai, kangaroo courts exist, instant justice is delivered not by the law of the land but by the unlawful mafia, not even underground but openly paraded by all political parties shielding that party interests. This is legal but for Tamils facing genocide if brave youth sacrifice their lives, those martyrs have to be exterminated. 

After Negroes attained liberation from slavery, right before our eyes Tamils of Eelam are forced to become slaves. If even that could be forgotten, how about Tamils of Colombo, who are not separatist but subscribe to one nation concept,are asked to register, as reported by Deccan Chronicle dated 5th January 2009. Mr.R.Bhagwan Singh, the descendent of the illustrious Raja Desingh who ruled Gingee writes with tears the woes of Tamils under Rajapakshe’s regime, in its own capital.

Indian ruling party will ignore the resolution of the Tamilnadu Assembly, just because it remains blind to truth in the Rajiv Gandhi’s murder. Indian ruling party still believes that George Bush will search and find chemical weapons in Iraq before he steps down this month and prove to the world that USA invaded Iraq on justifiable grounds. Like Bush, the Rao loyalists, Trojan horses within Congress, hope after hope that LTTE should be finished and its leader exterminated, so that posthumously Rao’s ghost or foreign hands in Rajiv Gandhi’s murder will remain unexposed before world history.

N.Nandhivarman General Secretary Dravida Peravai             5.1.2009

Friday, October 26, 2018

EMERGENCY MARTYRS DAY EVERY YEAR AFFIRMS ANTI-CONGRESSISM IN OUR MINDS


திராவிட நாடு கேட்டுப்  போராடிய எங்களை ஒடுக்கப் பிரிவினை தடைச் சட்டம் கொண்டு வந்த நேருவின் காங்கிரசை ,  இரண்டே நாடாளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர்களை வெற்றி பெற வைத்த தி.மு.கழகத்தை உடைக்க துரோகி ஈ .வெ ,கி .சம்பத்தை களமிறக்கி வெட்டிக்  கொள்ளும் உரிமையுடன் ஒட்டிக் கொள்ளும் உரிமை என்று தமிழ் தேசிய கட்சி தொடங்க செய்த நேருவின் காங்கிரசை , மலையக தமிழர்களை  நாடற்றவர்களாக்கிய லால் பகதூர் சாஸ்திரியின் காங்கிரசை , பெரும்பான்மை இழந்த இந்திரா காந்தியின் ஆட்சியை காப்பாற்றிய திராவிட முன்னேற்றக்  கழக ஆட்சியை கலைத்து கழக தலைவர்களை சிறையில் அடைத்து அடித்து உதைத்து  கழக கொள்கை பரப்புச் செயலாளர் சி.சிட்டிபாபுவையும் சாத்தூர் பாலகிருஷ்ணன் அவர்களையும் கொன்ற காங்கிரசை,  மிரட்சி நடிகர் எம்.ஜி.ஆர் மீது வருமான வரி சோதனை நடத்தி மிரட்டி தனிக்  கட்சி துவங்கச் செய்த காங்கிரசை ,  ஈழத் தமிழரை காப்பாற்ற அனுப்பப்பட்ட இந்திய அமைதி படையாலேயே அவர்களை கொன்று குவித்த ராஜிவ் காந்தியின் காங்கிரசை, உலகில் நாஜிக்களின் இனப்  படுகொலையை விட மிகப் பேரளவிலான இழைத்த தமிழர் இனப்  படுகொலை நடைபெற மௌன சாமியாராக மறைமுகமாக சிங்களவருக்கு உதவிய மௌன்  மோகன் சிங்கின் காங்கிரசை உயிருள்ளவரையும் செத்துவிட்டால்  சொர்க்கத்திலோ நரகத்திலோ எங்கு போனாலும் நான்  உறுதிபட எதிர்க்கப் போகும் காங்கிரசை  நினைவூட்டவே நெருக்கடி நாள் நினைவேந்தல் நிகழ்ச்சியை திராவிடப் பேரவை நடத்தியது. 1974 ல் புதுவை பிருந்தாவனம் பேராசியர் ராஜபாண்டியன் இல்லத்தில்  நான்  அளித்த விருந்தில் கலைஞருடன் சிட்டிபாபு..



Thursday, October 25, 2018

FIFTH WORLD ATHEIST CONFERENCE SPEECH OF N.NANDHIVARMAN in 2005




Paper presented at the 5 th World Atheist Conference organized by Atheist Center Vijawada at Siddhardtha Stadium
on January 7,8,9 of 2005

THE BUSINESS EMPIRES OF GODMEN:
A STUDY ON AUROBINDO ASHRAM

N.Nandhivarman General Secretary Dravida Peravai

Every bearded person with a saffron dress could become a saint in India. These pious men show the way to God, most theists’ think. But in reality they portray them as God and in that process fleece money from public and build their business empire. A freedom fighter Aurobindo Ghosh who fled from Bengal landed in Pondicherrry as refugee. He came under the influence of Paul Richard, a philosopher whose works he ventured to translate from French. Mahakavi Bharathiar introduced to Aurobindo Ghosh the literature of Tamil Siddhars especially Thirumoolar who wrote Thirumanthiram. As a blend of these influences with the mastery Aurobindo had over English he could write many books. Because he had been elevated to God status, no one dares to research the origins of his philosophy and the sources of his inspiration. But the learned judges of the Supreme Court had in their verdict admitted him to be only a philosopher and nothing more. Yet his followers propagate the idea that he is an avatar, which is an affront on the decision of the Supreme Court bench. In a bench judgment in the S.P.Mittal versus Union of India (AIR 1983) case Chief Justice V.Chandrachud, Justices P.N.Bhagawathy, V.Balakrishna Erady and R.B.Mishra with the exception of dissenting O.Chinnappa Reddy have made it clear that Aurobindo is only a Poet and Philosopher.

The Encyclopedia Britannica (1978 edition) describes Aurobindo Ghosh as “ seer, poet and Indian nationalist who originated the philosophy of cosmic salvation through spiritual evolution, a divine experience that will appear through the development of Gnostic mean to usher in a transcendental spiritual age in which man and the Universe are destined to become divine. Aurobindo’s theory of cosmic salvation, the paths to Union with Brahman is two way streets or channels. Enlightenment comes to man from above while the spiritual mind (super-mind) of man strives through yogic illumination to reach upward from below. When these two forces blend in an individual a Gnostic man is created. This yogic illumination transcends both reason and intuition and eventually leads to freeing of the individual from the bonds of individuality and by extension all mankind will eventually achieve mukthi (liberation) Thus Aurobindo created a dialectic mode of salvation not only for the individual but also for all mankind ”. Says the definition.

Karl Marx and dialectical materialism stands proven in the test of times whereas those who tried to rope the word dialectical for salvation stands proven to be false prophets.

Under the head History of Hinduism, Encyclopedia Britannica says, “Another modern teacher whose doctrines have had some influence outside India was Aurobindo, who began a career as a revolutionary. He with drew from politics, however, and settled in Pondicherry, then a French possession. There he established an ashrama (a retreat) and achieved high reputation as a sage. His followers looked on him as first reincarnate manifestation of super beings whose evolution he prophesized and apparently he did not discourage this belief. After his death, the leadership of the Ashram was taken over by The Mother Madame Mira Richard, a Frenchwoman who had been one of his leading disciples” Well it is the Mira Richard’s husband Paul Richard, whose works Aurobindo translated were one of the reasons for his philosophy to blossom. Let impartial researchers dig deep into the writings of both to arrive at a conclusion who influenced whom?

Aurobindo Ghosh, the reincarnation of Lord Krishna according to his followers could not prove his philosophy while he lived. He could use the mastery of the language to mesmerize people but he failed to become a Super human being. He passed away like other mortals. While he passed away rumours were spread that there will be a resurrection, a feeble attempt to equalize with Christian beliefs. That too failed, and he is laid to rest at Ashram. His philosophy also is laid to rest there. Yet even after God-man fails in his claims the spiritual business empires built by their followers are keen to keep alive a falsity and a failed promise.

After the original prophet failed, then French woman Mira Richard became the Mother to lead the Ashram. Did she succeed? She succeeded Aurobindo as Spiritual Master but did she succeed in proving the philosophy? Let us think this aspect here. The collected words of Mira Richard had been published and recorded in audiocassettes. Mother’s Agenda as the book calls itself claims that “ This tremendous document 6000 pages and in the 13 volumes is the day to day account over twenty two years of Mothers exploration into the body consciousness and of her discovery of a cellular mind capable of restructuring the nature of the body and the laws of the species as drastically as one day the first stammering of a thinking mind transformed the nature of the ape. It is a veritable document of experimental evolution. A revolution in consciousness that alters the laws of the species. And it is the question of our times, for whatever appearances, we are not at the end of a civilization but at the end of an evolutionary cycle. Are we going to find the passage to next species…. or perish? As scrupulously as a scientist in his laboratory, Mother goes back to the origins of matters formation to the primordial code, and there by chance stumbles upon the very power that changes death and upon a new energy which curiously parallels the most recent theories on the subatomic nature of matter. The key to matter contains the key to death and the key to next species”

The spiritual lady prophet who found the key to death is dead. Perhaps she had lost that key. And Aurobindo Ashram all these years had been searching for that key, and none found. Mira Richard did not succeed in altering the laws of species. And yet why she should be revered? Why should there be an ashram to propagate a failed theory? And why Ashram has no Guru after her? Why her followers failed to identify one successor to her seat? An ashram or mutt without a Guru in the own definition of Aurobindo had only to down its shutters. What exists is a mere Trust and subsidiary trusts.

About the Trust and its subsidiaries we had complained to the Government of India. Dravida Peravai complained to then UNION FINANCE MINISTER YASWANT SINHA on 10.10.1998.UNION DEFENCE MINISTER GEORGE FERNANDES had forwarded that complaint on 14 th October, and the Union Finance Minister had replied on 2nd November 1998. We reproduce that memorandum here.

 Poorest of the poor too are contributing their mite via indirect taxes. In such a situation, planned tax evasions and abuse of exemptions amounts to gravest of the crime.  Finance ministry must monitor the end use of exemptions, at least in cases where its attention is drawn. Motive: The motive to float a Trust must not be for tax evasion. Let us have a look at the resolution-dated 19.12.1975 of Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust. The opening lines are given in quote:

“ It has been decided in the interest of ashram that in order to be free from Income Tax on its business incomes that would otherwise be attracted inevitably because of the new Income Tax Amendment Act 1975 and the recent decisions of Supreme Court on Trusts doing business, the Ashram shall stop doing business and its existing businesses shall be taken over by Aurobindo Ashram Harpagan Workshop Trust………………………”

It is becoming crystal clear to one and all that the very name WORKSHOP in the TRUST sounds odd. It is similar to accosting a person as Mohammed Ibrahim Iyer. Management: It is to be noted that Mr.L.M.Pinto, a Goan is the founder of Aurobindo Ashram Harpagan workshop Trust. When SAAT transferred its business units to this Trust, as stated above to evade TAX, the names of the new Trustees of this Aurobindo Ashram Workshop Trust needs to be mentioned. They are Udar alias L.M.Pinto, Pradyot, Harikant.C.Patel, Dyuman, and Counama. SAME PERSONS WHO ARE TRUSTEES IN THIRU AUROBINDO ASHRAM TRUST HAVE OVERNIGHT BECOME TRUSTEES IN AUROBINDO ASHRAM HARPAGAN WORKSHOP TRUST. Old wine bottled in new bottle is clearly for tax evasion and nothing else, it will become proven without an iota of doubt…so continues the memorandum. That is tax evasion.

At the time of passing the Auroville Foundation Act, Mrs.Indira Gandhi sent her Home Minister to solicit opinion from within and came to the right conclusion .If the Center is blind to the on goings in ashram let them regret at a later date when things will go beyond a stage of redemption. Various agencies of the Center are regularly getting information on the scandals inside the ashram, and yet if Center pretends that all is well there, they will be blamed by the public for their inaction and passive submission to the criminalized management at the helm of affairs. This is with regard to ashram and its subsidiary trusts.

But there exists a so-called international city, a dream of the Late Mira Richard, known as Mother of Aurobindo Ashram. That can be said to be the story of deceit. Right from the beginning their aim is to establish a Vatican type of autonomous state.

1. Fact: NEW CITY STATE: Dr.Kirit Joshi Chairman of Governing Board with an Auroville delegation met Dr.Murli Manohar Joshi Minister for Hinduvta Development and Dr.Jagmohan Minister for Urban Development and presented the Master Plan ratified by the Governing Board in 18 &19 of December 1999. Earlier Residents Assembly had approved. (Source: Auroville Land Fund News Letter Number 12 April-May 2000) Question: Assembly in lexicon may mean different, here it seems Auro-villians consider it a city-state like Roman city-state.

2.Fact: RE-COLONIZATION A global campaign to raise $ 1 million or 5 crores by Mother’s birthday on 21 st Febraury 2004. (From 1 st January to November 2003 $ 550.000 has been donated) This is twice the amount Land Fund usually receives in a year. An excellent boost for Land Fund, and the equivalent of about 65 acres of precious land for Auroville. (Source: Land Fund News Letter number 31 November- December 2003) . Question: If $ 550,000 dollars can buy 65 acres what price is for 1 acre, and whether that price goes to the actual owner?

3.Fact: POLITICS OF ANARCHY: What political organization do you want for Auroville? To this question Mirra Alfasa replies: An amusing definition occurs to me: A divine anarchy. But the world will not understand. Men must be conscious of their psychic being and organize themselves spontaneously, without fixed rules and laws- that is the ideal. (Source: Draft II of a working paper on an international organization for Auroville September 2001)

Question: Mirra Alfasa, as you said world in your time may not understand the DIVINE ANARCHY let loose by you, but in present day even a LKG child will understand that you are against the laws of the land and want to create a lawless society.

4.Fact: A SEPARATE CURRENCY for a community within India is the first step to establish a city-state like Vatican here. Out of 191 member states of the world in United Nations, Vatican has opted out to remain outside the purview of UN, in spite of enjoying a status of a separate country. Similarly Aurovillians want to keep Auroville outside India and its constitution. THE FIRST STEP TO INTRODUCE AUROSE, a legal tender for Auroville is in place. (Source: Auroville News April 7 th 2001)  Question: Who is the Finance Minister of this new state, not born out of Tamil extremism but a product of Auro extremism?

5. Fact: EMBASSY IN DELHI: The newly yet to be independent country or a princely state or a colony of Kashmir Maharaja Hari Singh’s son Karan Singh intends to open an embassy in the National capital of Delhi. “ There is a possible opening for an Auroville “embassy” in Delhi through the possible help from Indian Habitat Centre.” (Source: Auroville News Feb 19 th 2000) Question: Before attaining freedom from India Auro extremists want an embassy. Will government of India allow Nagaland and other claimants of separate nations to open an embassy in Delhi?

Well all that is said are with regard to one Godman, the so-called reincarnation of Lord Krishna namely Aurobindo Ghosh. There are many Godmen in India like the Jayendra Saraswathi swamigal of Kanchi kamakodi peeth. The very foundation of this mutt is shaky, not because of tsunami but because of the castles of lies over which it rests. A 1933 Bombay High Court judgment said “ It is not disputed that the religious reformer Shankara, about the 8 th century A.D established four mutts or monasteries for sanyasis and ascetics in the North South, East and West of India.” Patna High Court in 1936 also had only recognized 4 mutts. During 1972 the Supreme Court of India stated that Sankara established four mutts as seats of religion at four ends on India, The Sringeri mutt on the sringeri hills in the south, the Sharada mutt on the Dwaraka in the west, the Badrinath mutt at Badrinath in the north and the Goverdana mutt at Puri in the East. Each of the mutts has a sanyasi as its head who bears the title of Shankaracharya in general. Sankara is said to have had 4 principle disciples who were all Brahmins. The orthodox Hindu recognizes no other sanyasis”

In a land governed by a constitution and rule of law, even after High courts and Supreme Court had said that only 4 mutts were created by Sankara, how come Kanchi mutt be a Shankara mutt and the daytime sanyasi and night time samsaris can hold the tag of Shankaracharya? Is it not a fraud committed on the people of India? To claim a status of Shankaracharya to a mutt head, which has no true inheritance of that mantle, is a daylight fraud over which till now no punishment is meted out. Quack Shankaracharyas too can roam as Godman and build business empires, all ends well for the spiritual capitalists. Let us expose all Indian Godman living or dead!


N.Nandhivarman
General Secretary Dravida Peravai
39 Montorsier Street Pondicherry 605001
Tel: 0413-2221025 Email : annaist@sify.com  /

 SPEECH of 2005 ....... 



Dream of an Aristocracy of Achievements Arising out of a Democracy of Opportunities” .. Aringnar Anna




ANNA DREAMS OF TAMILS UPLIFT

Mr. Chancellor, Mr. Pro-Chancellor Mr. Vice- Chancellor, Graduates of the Year and Friends:

Thankful as I am for the unique honor conferred on me by this institution, it is not without hesitation as a good deal of trepidation that I stand before this august assembly to-day to deliver the Convocation address, for though it is a pleasure to be present on the happy occasion of greeting the graduates of the year and wishing them all a bright and prosperous future, it is not an easy task to place before them appropriate guidelines-conscious as I am of my own limitations and aware of the eminence of those who stood at this rostrum in the past and gave weighty and worthy advice to the graduates. Stalwarts in various walks of life, scholars of erudition and experience, administrators of rare abilities, have all been here to deliver instructive discourses, and I do not for a moment imagine that I have the capacity to add any thing substantial to what has been already said by those who preceded me. I am convinced therefore that to be called upon to deliver this  address is not so much an invitation as a command to me bestow the most careful and considered thought on the role of Universities in general and of the Annamalai University in particular.

The fact that I am conscious of my own limitations gives me a sense of relief, for attempt I shall not to offer original ideas or theories with a special stamp, but only reiterate some of the cardinal principles enunciated by those who offered their a advice in past years, perhaps with annotations here and there, bringing to bear the lay-man’s point of view to the findings of experts in various fields connected with education.

This is the age of the common man-whatever the regrets some might have –and it’s his point of view that matters most and I do claim to represent him in all his ruggedness.

Systems and schools of thought, whether it is in philosophy or politics, ethics or economics, are certainly meant for him. Of course, the interpretation should come from scholars and experts and the art of translating them into every day activity is to be undertaken by the administrators. Universities, as the repositories of knowledge and the nursing ground for the emissaries of thought wisdom and service, have got a prominent  role to play-and the prominence is growing every day, as more and more individuals get themselves equipped for the task of bettering society in all its age when we have eschewed monarchy and autocracy and have inaugurated the era of democracy.

During the monarchical or feudal days, Universities had to train scholars and poets to adorn the chambers of Royalty or the gilded mansions of Lord and nobles and their wisdom was meant for the mansion, not for the market place. Those were days when numbers did not count, nor were eminent scholars asked to face the problems confronting the masses. They were content to work in secluded spheres, far from the din and noise of the common man and weave the costly fabric of philosophy of poetry which on turn was to be converted into dazzling garments for the select and the privileged.

The role of the University to-day is not cloistered and confined as in the past. Its function has been enlarged-not in its fundamentals but in its domain. It has to take into account the commonness, but to trim and train, guide and lead him, for asked to do his duty as the citizen of a democracy-a task which kindles sweet hopes but which demands, patience and perseverance, faith and confidence, faith in himself and in others and confidence in his inherent ability to shoulder the responsibilities. The common man has become the birth place of a potential ruler and the duty today, the responsibility today of the universities is to fashion out of him as an individual fitted and equipped for the task of making democracy fruitful and effective.

I said that the duties and responsibilities of Universities have grown in dimension and scope, but pointed out that the fundamentals remain unaltered and these fundamentals are of permanent value and of perennial interest. The supreme task before the University is to give those who seek a vision of knowledge in its true proportions and perspectives, to maintain the sovereignty of ideas and ideals in the world. A balanced mind, the ability to discriminate between what is merely trivial and what is important, the capacity to look at a problem from all its angles without fear or favour, to be tolerant of the other man’s point of view. These are fundamentals which are unalterable and it’s only the universities that can provide society with a continuous stream of men and women endowed with these qualities.

While addressing the University of Brussels, Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, our former president, made the following statement:

“For its proper functioning democracy requires more qualities than other forms of government. It is in the universities that we can develop the true spirit of democracy, appreciation of other points of view and adjustment of differences through discussions. It can be kept healthy and strong by the exercise of individual responsibility and judgement.in universities we have to re-call the struggles of the past and realize the perils and possibilities, the challenges and opportunities, of the present.”

Democracy is not a form of government alone –it is an invitation to a new life-an experiment in the art of sharing responsibilities and benefits-an attempt to generate the common task. Hence we cannot afford to waste a single talent, improverish a single man or woman or allow a single individual to be stunted in growth or held under tyranny and the universities should through the graduates it sends forth year after year, annihilate the forces that attempt at aggrandizement and tyranny, fight against caste and hypocrisy and enthrone human dignity.

Graduates of the year, I wish you all a prosperous future-for, after all, the immediate concern of every individual, graduate or no graduate, is to acquire the means for a decent living. That is the first motivation for all human activity and no one can ignore it, but that ought not to be the sole objective. Something higher and nobler than mere individual material advancement is expected of you – for remember that this University education is a privilege that you enjoy, for which you are deeply indebted to the community of which you are a member. Most of the money needed for maintaining institutions of higher education come from the revenues collected from the community through the State, and a good proportion of that revenue comes from the tillers and the toilers, men who did not enjoy this privilege, men who willingly submit themselves to discomfort, so that they can enable the next generation to lead a better life. Graduates of the Annamalai University, may I ask you, how you are going to repay – what is to be your contribution to the social chest on which you have drawn so largely. Unless you replenish it richly, coming generations will find only an empty coffer. Your superior education increases your responsibility to society and therefore, apart from or along with your own individual advancement, society has got a right to expect an adequate return from you – not so much in terms of money as in terms of service – in toning up society, in bringing light into the dark alleys, sunshine into dingy places, solace into the afflicted, hope unto the despondent and a new life unto every one.

That this is a welcome and worthy ideal none would dispute, but not every one will come forward to translate that ideal into action – and yet our ancient as well as modern thinkers have all stated in unmistakable terms that wisdom is manifested in action.

Unless service is the outcome, the sermons become sweet nothings. As Jefferson stated,“We must dream of an aristocracy of achievements arising out of a democracy of opportunities”

And when I seek your help and co-operation in the supreme task of serving society, please do not wink and smile and say, it is all so easy to say. I am not unaware of the difficulties in the way, nor am I going to brush aside the influence of the environment on you. May be, the world in which you are to begin the journey is one which will dim your hope, disturb your determination. You may come face to face with the unpleasant sight of practices widely differing from the principles inculcated in you. You may find self-seekers enthroned and the patient worker decried. Tyranny of all sorts may stare at you and every step you take will be a struggle. I admit that the environment is such that even people with robust optimism will be discouraged and forced to take to the part of ease and comfort.

But, we should also realize that a continuous stream of men and women endowed with the spirit of service has been carrying on the crusade successfully and have conferred rich benefit on humanity.

We, the Tamilians have been holding aloft this ideal for more than two thousand years and hence we find in Pura Nanuru this passage,

"c©lhš m«k ï›îyf« . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
jk¡bfd Kayh neh‹whŸ
ãw®¡bfd KaYe® c©ik ahnd!"

As inheritors of that rich legacy, you are best fitted to overcome even the environment and serve society to the best of your abilities,

Anyone, who proposes to do good must not expect people to roll stones out of his way, but must accept his lot calmly if they even roll a few more upon it. A strength which becomes clearer and stronger through its experience of such obstacles is the only strength that can conquer them – says Albert Schweitzer.

Though the problems in various countries are of a similar nature, the peculiarity attached to the problems of our country is of a pronounced nature.

Ours is not case of starting from scratch-had that been the case the only thing needed would have been the intensity of effort to be put forth. 

Ours is a case of erosion of the mind – we are not in search of fields, but have to engage in the task of fertilizing it, irrigating it, we are not in search of ideals, but are engaged in the more intricate task of classifying, codifying and verifying layers of ideals. We are not wanting in culture-but have to cleanse it from the cob-web of time and de-adulterate it. In short, we have to re-discover ourselves, and re-construct our entire thought. Once task to-day is to allow fresh air and sunshine and regain the original shape and stature – that which made us well

Known is distant lands and climes.Our literature, art and architecture are fine specimens of human intelligence – but they bear the ravages of time and also the effect of currents and cross currents so that to-day we have to listen to the foreign historian or scholar in order to realize the “glory and grandeur” of our own country.

Age commands veneration –but unless it is recuperated, decay sets in. our culture and civilization are hoary, but we have allowed scars and wrinkles to disfigure them. It is our duty therefore to re-discover and re-construct what is ours and enrich it by drawing liberally upon the achievements of other countries.

Our problem is not want of a system –in any branch of knowledge. We have fine specimens in all spheres. We claim also –and that rightly –immortality for our systems, but we have not succeeded in keeping them fresh and young, effective and energetic, for we have allowed them to decay.

If a system has to endure, says, Dr.Radhakrishnan, it must be perpetually young and ready to change. In other words, it must be capable of accepting new ideas, have the resilience of mind which the young have, have the openness, flexibility and spirit of adventure by which they accept what is given to them and transform it out of recognition.

Eos, a goddess falling in love with a mortal, prayed to god to grant immortality to the lover-‘yes’, said god, and the mortal gained immortality. But he grew old, infirm, senile, decayed –and what was a feast once to the eyes of Eos became a sight to shun and grieve over –and he who gained immortality longed for death – for what is life if it becomes a prey to decay? Then Eos sighed and said, “I prayed for immortality for my lover, forgetting to pray for perpetual youth.”

We in this country are facing some such situation – and we are in charge of the task of rejuvenating our culture and civilization – our entire thought, instead of attempting that, we have been, for too long a period, doting upon the decayed forms attempting to defend them from critics and currents of new thought. And while other parts of the world, after persistent and patient search after truth, have arrived at new conclusions and are scaling new heights, we are content to sit near the shattered rampart and narrate past glory.

Our religion has degenerated into rituals, our society which was once classless and casteless has degenerated into water –tight compartments of caste and creed and all the while, we have kept either silent or have been supplying defense to superstition and orthodoxy by offering liberal allowing this state of affairs to exist, despite condemnation and protest, and, more than that, whenever a doughty warrior comes forth to fight against the evils prevalent, we decry and denounce him as an annihilator of noble values and hoary systems.

 Periyar Ramasami represents and symbolizes the fury and frustration in a sizable section of society at this state of affairs. To allow systems to degenerate and at the same time denounce those who champion the cause of rationalism is but to perpetuate superstition and orthodoxy and allow this society of ours to get decomposed.

Universities offer the proper forum for a free and full discussion of these intricate problems and graduates trained here are to go forth as emissaries of that social reconstruction which is long over due. The country looks to centers of learning like this

Universities to enable the people to pursue the path of progress, braving difficulties and if need be, courting danger.

Graduates of the Annamalai University, let me call upon you to carry on the crusade against caste which cannot co-exist with democracy, against superstition which cannot co-exist with science and against tyranny of various dimensions which cannot co-exist with liberty, equality and fraternity.

Pursuing vocations for your and your families’ well being, you have to perform your duty towards society. You are to become torch – bearers of rationalism – and rationalism does not mean repudiation of basic and fundamental truths and maxims, but the annihilation of dubious modes of thought and action. You have to work hard and with daring and dash, for we have to clear cob-webs which are centuries old and let reason reign supreme.

Another peculiar feature of our times is the fact that we are a nation in the making, and if in their anxiety to forge integration, some confuse unity with uniformity, it is the duty of men trained here to clearly enunciate the principle and see to it that, in the name of unity, no part of the country is made to become the vassal of another part-knowingly or unknowingly. We cannot be a party to foul play, however worthy the goal. Just on the eve of independence Rajaji stated with an acumen all his own, “our political experiment is really like melting iron and metals and pouring them in to a crucible and making an alloy, an alloy which can stand wear and tear . It is not like the chinaware that other people have turned out in their countries. Their democracies were easy to make – like plastics. But we are dealing with metals.” National integration is a goal, worthy and much – sought after, but neither in the field of language nor in the economic sphere, could we tolerate injustice and domination. That is exactly why this government was brought into existence – it represents the determination of the people to be coerced into accepting Hindi as the official language.

When we plead for the continuance of English as the link language, some people do misrepresent us and misinterpret our motive. They trot out untenable arguments and disputable statistics, bring in the bogey of disintegration and want to silence people by threats and troops. Problems were never solved by autocratic methods – and this problem of language is intimately connected with our way of life, not for the present alone but for the future as well.

The government of Tamilnadu has stated in unmistakable terms that Tamil and English can serve all our purposes, the former as the official language of this state and the latter as the link language. If it is accepted and the most emphatic of Hindi protagonists do accept that - if it is accepted that English can serve admirably as a link between our state and the outside world, why plead for Hindi to be the link language here? What serves to link us with the outside world is certainly capable of rendering the same service inside India as well. To plead for two link languages is like boring a smaller hole in a wall for the kitten while there is a bigger one for the cat. What suits the cat will suit the kitten as well

English is foreign, some argue, as if we were out to destroy or give up everything foreign. We bring foreign wear in foreign ships. We seek foreign aid not only in the shape of money bur also in the from of technical know-how and not a week passes without one or other leader undertaking a journey to the west or east to secure whatever aid is possible to secure. And on top of all these things, we have given up so many systems peculiarly our own.

We are not content with rural economy, we want Trombays and Ennores. And we are not conscious of their being foreign; only in the matter of language we pose as being ultra –nationalists and dub the English language as foreign.

Shelly and Byron, Keats and Coleridge, Emerson and Bacon-they are not foreign to us in the strict sense of the term. Is Tiruvalluvar a mere Tamilian? They are all world citizens – world teachers. And the language enshrining their thoughts is not to be discarded just because it comes from another country. That we are not going to accord a higher status to English is borne out by the fact that we have accepted and are implementing with due caution the principle of making Tamil the medium of instruction in colleges –progressively.

University education is an epitome of all that is best in thought cultivated in various countries, and from you should radiate universal thought and cosmopolitan ideas.

And if we are to get all these and more from out of the graduates of the University we have to re-examine the methods in vogue in universities, in teaching and in administration, and so perfect them that every student feels that he is a co-sharer of the pleasure and privilege of knowledge along with his professors. I shall not dabble in methods of teaching or administration-experts in that field are the natural custodians-my plea is only as regards the necessity for a re-examination.

While the functions assigned to universities are mostly of the same type, the Annamalai University, by its structure and spirit, has got a special function of its own. The great founder’s nobility and generosity has made this institution gain the esteem of eminent men here and elsewhere; but if we analyze the thought and motive force of Rajah Sir Annamalai Chettiar, we will find that he wanted this place to be not only a seat of learning and research of Tamil Culture and Tamil polity. He had the foresight to realize that Tamilians were going to cultivate their special talents and that was exactly why he started and made a success of the Tamil Isai Movement. Rajah Sir was never a man of tall talk-he believed in solid work and he knew the time was bound to come for us to delve deep into our annals and literature, culture and civilization and succeed in getting due and adequate recognition in the world forum.

Truly great has been our achievement in the field of literature. To be able to announce to the world that we the Tamilians do process.


“e‰¿id ešy FWªbjhid I§FWü
bwh¤j gâ‰W¥g¤ njh§F gÇghlš
f‰w¿ªnjh® V¤J« fÈnah lf«òwbk‹
¿¤âw¤j v£L¤ bjhif”

And to present to the world the great Tirukkural which is a Code of Conduct for the entire humanity are something about which we can have pardonable pride and pleasure.

And yet, are we devoting enough attention to these Tamil Classics? Addressing the Convocation here in 1943, the late lamented Sir R.K. Shanmukham Chetty had the following to say:-

“I graduated with a complete ignorance of Tamil Culture and History: in fact with a great deal of contempt for these. I attained a fair degree of proficiency in English literature and the history of European culture. I acquired some knowledge of even Anglo- Saxon and Gothic. I read the translation of the Bible in the Gothic language , but I had not read the Kural of Valluvar. I could understand Chaucer, but the name of Ilango was nothing but a name. Even after leaving College, I kept alive my interest in these studies and built up a Library in which there was not a single Tamil book.

In my early youth when I lived in a world of my own with no sense of responsibility, all this made no difference to me and I was proud of my learning. Soon when manhood came with its cares and problems, I found myself a stranger in my own home…….Gradually I began to realize the incongruity of my scheme of life and for some time now I have been endeavoring to rectify the balance. It was only a few years ago that I seriously attempted to study some of the Tamil Classics. I find that they are fit to rank among the immortal works of the world. I now bitterly regret my neglect of the treasures of my own land.”

It was not an apologia, but the expression of a new determination and Sir R.K.Shanmukaham lived to establish the truth that he had mastered not only the Tamil language but Tamil literature as well. Had he lived for some more years, he would traveled many a land carrying the message of the Tamil Classics, which spoke at such a hoary past about

“x‹nw FyK« xUtnd njtD«”

“ahJ« Cnu ahtU« nfË®”

“Éidna Mlt®¡F cÆnu”

“ešyJ brŒjš M‰Ö uhÆD«
mšyJ brŒjš X«òÄ‹”

“v›tÊ ešyt® Mlt®
m›tÊ mšy thÊa Ãynd”

“bršt¤J¥ gand

“ÔJ« e‹W« ãw® ju thuh”

“gF¤J©L gšYÆ® X«òjš ünyh®
bjhF¤jt‰WŸ všyh« jiy”

Thoughts now placed before the world as blossoms of the modern age.

You, graduates of the Annamalai University, have got undertake the special task of carrying the message that our classics contain to the entire world and declare that what was the most ancient here is what is being introduced to-day as the most modern.

South India is the home of the most ancient culture Though for a fairly long period there was the mist of ignorance, thick and widespread, it has now been acknowledge by all that Dravidian Civilization of a highly developed character can be traced back to the second and third millennia before Christ. Many a Foreign scholar has borne testimony to the perfection with which Tamil language has been developed into an instrument of precise and subtle thought and to the beauty and richness of the literature – which is contained in it. Dravidian literature, philosophy, art and architecture offer therefore a rich and fruitful field for exploration and critical investigation.

Not for more glorification but for a just appreciation of all that is of real value and beauty in our past heritage. We need this research and investigation.

I do not propose to talk about your responsibility in the political arena. Suffice it to say that you should make democracy safe and sound, salubrious and fruitful.

Carry the message that this Universities has given to you wherever you go, whatever the station you find yourselves in and elevate the common man- the average man-

“He seems incredible but represents two –thirds of mankind. He lives in hut. He cannot read or write. His energy is sapped by disease. He labours up to 15 hours a day. He works on land he does not own. He and his family are family are usually hungry. He will die young. But he still has hopes for his children; that they will be strong and healthy; will be able to read and write, will know individual freedom in a peaceful world. This is the world’s average Man.”

And the world over, this average Man has become conscious of the injustice done to him and as a consequence we find agitations and marches, struggles and clashes. In many a country, measures to raise his level have been undertaken. Take a pledge, here and now, that we will not lag behind and leave our average man in the lurch. For if the base is weak, the dome is doomed. Inheritors as you are of a noble heritage, you are eminently fitted for this noble task, and on its success depends the future of this nation as of others.

Let us remember what Woodrow Wilson said,

“Nations are renewed from the bottom not from the top . . . real wisdom of human life is compounded out of the experiences of ordinary men. The utility, the vitality, the fruitage of life comes like the natural growth of a great tree, from the soil, up through the trunk into the branches to the foliage and the fruit. The great struggling unknown masses of the men who are not the base of everything are the dynamic force that is lifting the level of society. A nation is as great and only as great as her rank and file.”

May I submit my plea to you, youths blossoming forth from this institution, be firm but not obstinate, let here be a blending of ideas, but never cheap imitation and injurious adulteration, beware of mistaking obsessions for principles and fads for facts, strike at a synthesis and avoid subservience, view as the final on to protest against injustice but project not your own view as the final one, forget not the ancient saying

“f‰wJif« k©zsî fšyh Jyfsî”

And father not when you practice what you profess.

University education gives you the basic needs for this stupendous task, but that is not enough. Say along

I read, I study
I examine, I listen
I reflect, and out of
All this, I try to form
An idea in which I can put as
Much of commonsense
As I can.

And remember the longest journey is the journey inward, and since graduation is but the starting point of that journey, I wish you success-reach the goal yourselves-teach others to march towards the goal and let that goal be,

A world without the
beggar’s out-stretched
palm, the miser’s
heartless, stony stare,
the piteous wail of
want, the pallid face
of crime, the
livid lips of lies,
the cruel eyes
of scorn,
A race without
disease of flesh or
brain, shapely and
fair, the married
harmony of form and
use-where
life lengthens, fear
dies, joy deepens,
love intensifies, and
Man regains his
Dignity.

And to get these things realized, let us one and all strive towards the ideal enunciated by Thiruvalluvar,

“cWgáí« Xth¥ ãÂí« brWgifí«
nruh âaštJ ehL”

I am confident that you are being sent into the wide world by the Annamalai University with this objective-you are bound to win, for you are adequately equipped with the spirit supplied by this great institution. May your life be a bright one, and may its luster brighten the entire land! Accept my congratulations and march onwards, towards the land of smiles.

[Annamalai University Convocation Address of Tamilnadu Chief Minister C.N.Annadurai on 18.11.1967]

  

AIADMK spent Rs 641 crore in 2016 to bribe its way back to power Documents reveal that AIADMK spent Rs 641 cr in 2016 to bribe its ...